KawaMood
Assigned
Reported
MC-277909
Rescaled entity with the scale attribute can't face other entities eyes correctly
Invalid
MC-274841
Mobs with range-attack AI struggle on non-full blocks
Duplicate
MC-266798
Wandering Trader can't pathfind correctly when on a vehicle
Won't Fix
MC-259772
Invalid references in the tick/load function tag of a data pack prevent functions from the tick/load function tag of all other data packs from loading
Won't Fix
MC-257580
Consuming a Honey Bottle in Creative Mode triggers the "consume_item" advancement criterion twice
Duplicate
MC-250610
Removing a data pack using a custom dimension with custom biomes returns an error
Won't Fix
MC-249546
Villagers look at invisible villagers
Confirmed
MC-238437
Features are generated after structures features during worldgen
Awaiting Response
MC-232387
AngryAt and AngerTime NBT auto-refill when manually reseted
Duplicate
MC-231251
The "data" in "append_static" of "block_entity_modifier" in "rule" processor and biome item particle effect's "tag" don't work as expected
Confirmed
MC-226874
Player's owned player_head on mobs are flashing
Fixed
MC-226492
looking_at subpredicate doesn't detect entities through transparent blocks
Works As Intended
MC-226490
looking_at subpredicate doesn't respect special blocks hitboxes
Works As Intended
MC-226487
looking_at subpredicate doesn't always detect visible entities
Works As Intended
Comments
Just as this thread as been re-opened and marked as important, I can confirm the issue still happens for all versions since the one I created this issue, so 1.19.3 to 1.21.4 and recent snapshots. Unfortunately, I still get reports from my users who don't understand why my data packs don't work for them. I have to explain them this issue and show the error "missing tick reference" from their logs coming from other datapacks they use.
Oh crap, how did I miss that. Indeed, this can be marked as invalid.
Hi, yes it is indeed the same issue as MC-174500
I searched with many terms but didn't manage to find it. You can mark it as duplicate then, thanks!
Can confirm 1.20.4.
Can confirm for version 1.19.4. Still a real issue.
Shouldn't it be more consistent to change the current default behavior to "optional" then?
Can confirm on 1.19.1 and 1.19.2
Confirmed in 1.18.2
Yes, I meant "removing a data pack that provides a custom dimension [...]".
I edited it to be more explicit.
Can confirm 1.18.2 (video uploaded)
Can confirm in 1.18.2
Can confirm for 1.18.2 Release-candidate 1
Can confirm for 1.21.5